Data presented at the ESMO Congress 2025
Andrey Mitroshkin,1 Jean-Baptiste Bachet,2 Kalena Marti,3 Carmine Pinto,4 György Bodoky,5 Rocio Garcia-Carbonero,6 Elias Choucair,7 Bénédicte Chevallier,7 Adam Sullivan,8 Miriam Koopman.9
1. Klinikum Freudenstadt, AkademischesLehrkrankenhaus der UniversitätTübingen, Karl-von-Hahn-Strasse, 100, 72250 Freudenstadt, Germany; 2. Sorbonne Université, Service d’hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP, Paris, France; 3. Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK; 4. Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, AUSL – IRCCS di Reggio Emilia – Viale Risorgimento, 80 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy; 5. Dél-Pesti Centrumkórház Szent László Telephely Albert Flórián út 5–7 1097 Budapest, Hungary; 6. Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Imas12, Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Avenida De Córdoba s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain; 7. Servier, 35 rue Verdun, 92284 Suresnes, France; 8. Servier Pharmaceuticals, 200 Pier 4 Blvd, Boston, MA 02210, USA; 9. Department of Medical Oncology,University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University Heidelberglaan 100 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Data on real-world treatment of mCRC in 3L and beyond is limited to specific agents or to a single country1,2
With recent advances in mCRC therapies, such as trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) ± bevacizumab, or fruquintinib, 3L treatment is no longer considered rescue therapy, with prolonged survival benefits being observed in clinical trials.3,4 However, there is little information on real-world treatment patterns or the impact of these treatment patterns, or other variables, on survival and other outcomes
PROMETCO (NCT03935763) is the first international, prospective, real-world study of treatment of patients with mCRC after two disease progressions since diagnosis5
Aim: To assess real-world treatment patterns and effectiveness in patients with mCRC
Adults (aged ≥18 years) with a confirmed mCRC diagnosis
Two disease progressions since diagnosis of first metastasis
Willing to receive subsequent treatment
At enrollment (from March 2019 onwards), data for lines of therapy were collected retrospectively before two disease progressions and prospectively during 18-month follow-up period, including effectiveness data5
The four most frequently used treatment sequences were identified based on number of patients of each treatment group per line
Treatment pathway
Efficacy outcomes
Conclusions
3L, third-line; FTD/TPI, trifluridine/tipiracil; mCRC, metastatic colorectal cancer.
1. Taieb J, et al. BMC Cancer. 2023;23(1):94; 2. Weiss L, et al. ESMO Open. 2022;7(1):100391; 3. Prager GW, et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(18):1657–67; 4. Dasari A, et al. Lancet. 2023;402(10395):41–53; 5. Koopman M, et al. Future Oncol. 2022;18(11):1313–20.
back to top
back to top